Comments on: A Queue Isn’t An Implementation Detail

By: udidahan

udidahan — Sun, 07 Jun 2009 07:11:06 +0000

Vadim,

It is actually linked in the post, but here it is again:

http://blogs.msdn.com/drnick/archive/2009/05/22/tripping-over-missing-servers.aspx

Thanks.

By: Vadim

Vadim — Sat, 06 Jun 2009 18:20:04 +0000

Hello, Udi!
Could you please publish a link to this Nick’s post?

By: Services Are Not Objects « Tim Ross – .NET Developer

Services Are Not Objects « Tim Ross – .NET Developer — Sat, 06 Jun 2009 15:40:31 +0000

[...] on Twitter, when Udi Dahan, SOA specialist and creator of NServiceBus, pointed us to a recent blog post of his that explains why we shouldn’t call services as if they were real objects. Udi suggests [...]

By: udidahan

udidahan — Thu, 28 May 2009 10:37:57 +0000

Willem,

That’s the thing – we shouldn’t be trying to make things easier, but to make them simpler. The approach is very different and requires much deeper understanding, but the result is better for it.

By: willem

willem — Thu, 28 May 2009 06:38:30 +0000

Thanks Udi, a very good point. Especially in the Microsoft world we try to make things easier, but in the process we forget what a technology is all about. For example – the ASP.NET WebForms model trying to be WinForms or Distributed Services trying to be normal objects… etc.