Comments on: Durable Messaging Is Not Enough http://www.udidahan.com/2008/01/09/durable-messaging-is-not-enough/ Enterprise Development Expert & SOA Specialist Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:21:18 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: udidahan http://www.udidahan.com/2008/01/09/durable-messaging-is-not-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-13899 udidahan Fri, 11 Jan 2008 07:08:43 +0000 http://udidahan.weblogs.us/2008/01/09/durable-messaging-is-not-enough/#comment-13899 Being compared to Pat is a big compliment - thank you. Being compared to Pat is a big compliment – thank you.

]]> By: Oran http://www.udidahan.com/2008/01/09/durable-messaging-is-not-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-13882 Oran Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:43:38 +0000 http://udidahan.weblogs.us/2008/01/09/durable-messaging-is-not-enough/#comment-13882 Sounds like Pat Helland's post a few weeks ago, Durability Is in the Eye of the Beholder: http://blogs.msdn.com/pathelland/archive/2007/12/27/durability-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder.aspx Sounds like Pat Helland’s post a few weeks ago, Durability Is in the Eye of the Beholder:
http://blogs.msdn.com/pathelland/archive/2007/12/27/durability-is-in-the-eye-of-the-beholder.aspx

]]> By: udidahan http://www.udidahan.com/2008/01/09/durable-messaging-is-not-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-13865 udidahan Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:17:36 +0000 http://udidahan.weblogs.us/2008/01/09/durable-messaging-is-not-enough/#comment-13865 Mr_Simple, or should I just call you "hey Mister" :-) If you were to create an entirely Amazon based solution, then SQS would probably be a good choice. However, if you're currently running your solution on your own infrastructure, the latency of going to Amazon between all calls between your own servers and your partners systems, and vice versa, would probably be unacceptable at even moderate loads. Mr_Simple, or should I just call you “hey Mister” :-)

If you were to create an entirely Amazon based solution, then SQS would probably be a good choice. However, if you’re currently running your solution on your own infrastructure, the latency of going to Amazon between all calls between your own servers and your partners systems, and vice versa, would probably be unacceptable at even moderate loads.

]]> By: Mr_Simple http://www.udidahan.com/2008/01/09/durable-messaging-is-not-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-13859 Mr_Simple Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:56:25 +0000 http://udidahan.weblogs.us/2008/01/09/durable-messaging-is-not-enough/#comment-13859 Isn't this where one possible solution is to store the messages on Amazon Simple Queue Service to start with? Isn’t this where one possible solution is to store the messages on Amazon Simple Queue Service to start with?

]]>