<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advanced Object Creation with Dependency Injection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.udidahan.com/2007/04/09/advanced-object-creation-with-dependency-injection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.udidahan.com/2007/04/09/advanced-object-creation-with-dependency-injection/</link>
	<description>Enterprise Development Expert &#38; SOA Specialist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 15:16:10 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Generic Validation</title>
		<link>http://www.udidahan.com/2007/04/09/advanced-object-creation-with-dependency-injection/comment-page-1/#comment-1531</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Generic Validation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://udidahan.weblogs.us/2007/04/09/advanced-object-creation-with-dependency-injection/#comment-1531</guid>
		<description>[...] the generics patch I put out for the Spring.Net Framework allows us to do this in one simple line of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the generics patch I put out for the Spring.Net Framework allows us to do this in one simple line of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayende Rahien</title>
		<link>http://www.udidahan.com/2007/04/09/advanced-object-creation-with-dependency-injection/comment-page-1/#comment-1298</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayende Rahien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 06:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://udidahan.weblogs.us/2007/04/09/advanced-object-creation-with-dependency-injection/#comment-1298</guid>
		<description>That is fairly complex logic, because by this you also mean that if I want to validate a person, and I have IValidator, would you want it as well or not?
Do you have one dimension of inheritance here or multiplies thereof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is fairly complex logic, because by this you also mean that if I want to validate a person, and I have IValidator, would you want it as well or not?<br />
Do you have one dimension of inheritance here or multiplies thereof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thesoftwaresimplist</title>
		<link>http://www.udidahan.com/2007/04/09/advanced-object-creation-with-dependency-injection/comment-page-1/#comment-1260</link>
		<dc:creator>thesoftwaresimplist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 03:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://udidahan.weblogs.us/2007/04/09/advanced-object-creation-with-dependency-injection/#comment-1260</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m asking for objects that can validate a customer, if there&#039;s an object that validates all entities, I should be getting it too. This allows me to perform better separation of concerns.

Of course, if I asked for IValidator of IPerson, where ICustomer inherited from IPerson, I would not want to get CustomerValidator back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m asking for objects that can validate a customer, if there&#8217;s an object that validates all entities, I should be getting it too. This allows me to perform better separation of concerns.</p>
<p>Of course, if I asked for IValidator of IPerson, where ICustomer inherited from IPerson, I would not want to get CustomerValidator back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayende Rahien</title>
		<link>http://www.udidahan.com/2007/04/09/advanced-object-creation-with-dependency-injection/comment-page-1/#comment-1257</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayende Rahien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://udidahan.weblogs.us/2007/04/09/advanced-object-creation-with-dependency-injection/#comment-1257</guid>
		<description>Nope, that is actually not the reason. I am not sure about Spring, but Castle Windsor is capable of handling generic services, but the logic for it is very simple, if you have registered a specialized generic service, it wouldn&#039;t try to give you the more generalized version.
There is an article on MSDN from me about this exact issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, that is actually not the reason. I am not sure about Spring, but Castle Windsor is capable of handling generic services, but the logic for it is very simple, if you have registered a specialized generic service, it wouldn&#8217;t try to give you the more generalized version.<br />
There is an article on MSDN from me about this exact issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

