<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Service-Layer Separation of Concerns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.udidahan.com/2007/04/01/service-layer-separation-of-concerns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.udidahan.com/2007/04/01/service-layer-separation-of-concerns/</link>
	<description>Enterprise Development Expert &#38; SOA Specialist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:59:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Tasks and Spaces versus Messages and Handlers</title>
		<link>http://www.udidahan.com/2007/04/01/service-layer-separation-of-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-1670</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Tasks and Spaces versus Messages and Handlers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2007 15:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://udidahan.weblogs.us/2007/04/01/service-layer-separation-of-concerns/#comment-1670</guid>
		<description>[...] The interesting thing for me in this design is that it&#8217;s somewhat different from the messaging paradigm I&#8217;ve been so successful with. Here we don&#8217;t use messages as simple Data Transfer Objects. Tasks contain both data and behavior. This behavior used to belong to message handlers. I like having separate message handlers, it enables me to create very flexible pipelines. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The interesting thing for me in this design is that it&#8217;s somewhat different from the messaging paradigm I&#8217;ve been so successful with. Here we don&#8217;t use messages as simple Data Transfer Objects. Tasks contain both data and behavior. This behavior used to belong to message handlers. I like having separate message handlers, it enables me to create very flexible pipelines. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Service Component Architecture, Service Data Objects, and my bus</title>
		<link>http://www.udidahan.com/2007/04/01/service-layer-separation-of-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-1527</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Service Component Architecture, Service Data Objects, and my bus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://udidahan.weblogs.us/2007/04/01/service-layer-separation-of-concerns/#comment-1527</guid>
		<description>[...] terms of SCA, it&#8217;s components seem to correspond to the Service Layer of an Autonomous [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] terms of SCA, it&#8217;s components seem to correspond to the Service Layer of an Autonomous [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Web Service Software Factory - Data Access CRUD!</title>
		<link>http://www.udidahan.com/2007/04/01/service-layer-separation-of-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-1456</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Web Service Software Factory - Data Access CRUD!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2007 18:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://udidahan.weblogs.us/2007/04/01/service-layer-separation-of-concerns/#comment-1456</guid>
		<description>[...] anything, the business components, when you actually look at the code in them, are more service layer objects than anything else. Which kind of makes you wonder why there is a separate Service Implementation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] anything, the business components, when you actually look at the code in them, are more service layer objects than anything else. Which kind of makes you wonder why there is a separate Service Implementation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Can Indigo be my bus?</title>
		<link>http://www.udidahan.com/2007/04/01/service-layer-separation-of-concerns/comment-page-1/#comment-1206</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Can Indigo be my bus?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 22:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://udidahan.weblogs.us/2007/04/01/service-layer-separation-of-concerns/#comment-1206</guid>
		<description>[...] Service-Layer Separation of Concerns achieved by using Bus API. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Service-Layer Separation of Concerns achieved by using Bus API. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
