<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fear those Tiers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.udidahan.com/2007/03/20/fear-those-tiers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.udidahan.com/2007/03/20/fear-those-tiers/</link>
	<description>Enterprise Development Expert &#38; SOA Specialist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 06:27:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: udidahan</title>
		<link>http://www.udidahan.com/2007/03/20/fear-those-tiers/comment-page-1/#comment-36043</link>
		<dc:creator>udidahan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://udidahan.weblogs.us/2007/03/20/fear-those-tiers/#comment-36043</guid>
		<description>Steve,

Updated the link to the MSDN site:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc168629.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,</p>
<p>Updated the link to the MSDN site:</p>
<p><a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc168629.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc168629.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.udidahan.com/2007/03/20/fear-those-tiers/comment-page-1/#comment-36039</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://udidahan.weblogs.us/2007/03/20/fear-those-tiers/#comment-36039</guid>
		<description>Udi, the link doesn&#039;t take me to the article, can you update the link?

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Udi, the link doesn&#8217;t take me to the article, can you update the link?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thesoftwaresimplist</title>
		<link>http://www.udidahan.com/2007/03/20/fear-those-tiers/comment-page-1/#comment-8586</link>
		<dc:creator>thesoftwaresimplist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://udidahan.weblogs.us/2007/03/20/fear-those-tiers/#comment-8586</guid>
		<description>Darrel,

Thanks so much for your kind words.
Want to join the chorus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darrel,</p>
<p>Thanks so much for your kind words.<br />
Want to join the chorus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrel Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.udidahan.com/2007/03/20/fear-those-tiers/comment-page-1/#comment-8546</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrel Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 01:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://udidahan.weblogs.us/2007/03/20/fear-those-tiers/#comment-8546</guid>
		<description>That was an excellent article.  I was able to relate to so many of your experiences and your questions.
I watched fat client Client/Server architecture get thrown by the wayside in the late 90&#039;s because people implemented applications that were ignorant of their distributed nature.  They were replaced by web apps where the app server was either on the same machine or very close to the database server, allowing developers to remain ignorant of the issues of distribution.  Still to this day there are so many business applications that are being deployed in Terminal Server environments because they were built with an architecture that assumed a very low network latency.
The issues that you bring up in your article need to be discussed far more often in the dev community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was an excellent article.  I was able to relate to so many of your experiences and your questions.<br />
I watched fat client Client/Server architecture get thrown by the wayside in the late 90&#8217;s because people implemented applications that were ignorant of their distributed nature.  They were replaced by web apps where the app server was either on the same machine or very close to the database server, allowing developers to remain ignorant of the issues of distribution.  Still to this day there are so many business applications that are being deployed in Terminal Server environments because they were built with an architecture that assumed a very low network latency.<br />
The issues that you bring up in your article need to be discussed far more often in the dev community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
